The Daily Show’s Jason Jones systematically dismantled The New York Times in a segment on last night’s show:
I’m certainly of two minds about the recent buzz around the death of the newspaper industry. I agree with what NYT Executive Editor Bill Keller says at the end of the interview — that firsthand journalism is EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. And that organizations like the NYT are the only ones who can pay for international journalism on a large scale (when was the last time you heard of any bloggers reporting from Afghanistan?).
But, man. These guys have to come up with an innovative business model. And quick! And I have yet to hear any viable proposals from anyone.
It doesn’t make much sense, IMHO, for the Times to adopt WSJ’s online paying model. With all due respect to Rupert Murdoch (not much), the WSJ has a completely different audience. And it’s required reading for business types, who all probably write off the paper as a business expense. Or have their firms buy it for then. Who is going to pay for The New York Times? Sure. Some people will. But not an entire generation that’s used to getting its news for free.
I don’t know about you, but when The Times has tried this in the past and I came across a “you can’t see this article unless you pay for it, buddy” screen, I went to find the story somewhere else. And in most cases, a similar story had been posted — via AP or wire services — circulated, and reblogged to the extent that it was pretty ubiquitous.
I certainly applaud NYT’s drastic measures to try to stay afloat. And I certainly don’t have any answers for them as to how to keep their newspaper in business — there are no easy answers.
Is it time for more drastic measures? Cut paper circulation entirely? Charge a lot more for the actual paper — turning it into a luxury item? Cut entire department/ sections? (Opinions — which are a dime a dozen these days, Times Magazine, Classifieds… all of which are limited in reach and/or covered better by the internet). Probably.
Either way, someone needs to come in and drastically rethink the entire business model. Looking at it in a positive way, this whole crisis is a great opportunity for The Times. They are an industry leader. They have been for years. Who better to teach the rest of the industry how to do investigative journalism in the 21st Centuary?
Like I said, I don’t have a good answer on this one. But I certainly hope someone does. The Times (and other papers like it) is a really important news source. I’d hate to see it disappear.
My boss just sent this to me, and it’s awesome. It just takes a piece of bacon and slaps it over your favorite (or least favorite) site. Like AOL, for example:
You can do it to any site you want — this site, for example. Just add the site url after the bacolicio.us/
I’m a little sad today. I tried to buy a copy of the new Dirty Projectors album that I’ve been blabbing about for a few months now, and couldn’t get my hands on a copy. Partly because the record store I like forgot to order it (I’d mention their name but I’d prefer not to give them any love at the moment). So fine. It’s New York City. I thought it’d be pretty easy to find another shop with a copy.
Nope.
Partly because the 3 remaining shops around Christopher Street mostly seem to cater to vinyl lovers. Partly because most of the other stores that would’ve carried the record are now gone. There used to be about 12 of them in that area (and there are still 10 on Google maps) but their numbers seem to have dwindled to about 3.
It remains a question, in my mind at least, as to why this happened. Was it the economy? Was it the mega-stores (in which case, thank you Tower and Circuit City for driving these places out of business and then closing yourself)? Or is it that selling CDs in a digital distribution age is a losing proposition (I feel like I’ve actually heard other people musing over this last one recently, but I can’t remember where)?
I certainly can’t say for sure, but the net result is that I didn’t get a copy of the CD I went out of my way to try to purchase today.
Sad for me. And I guess for all of us. Because I’m now going to help perpetuate the problem by either buying online or getting it from one of the remaining annoying mega-outlet stores. Assuming they carry it. Which is probably about 50/50.
I guess I’m not saying anything profound today. Just noticing that this might be a dying industry, and that I’ll miss it when it’s gone.
You know I like these guys. I’ve blogged about them before. And I’ve definitely been waiting for this new album to come out (since I was not one of the lucky ones to get my hands on a leaked copy).
I definitely dig it. It has a sound unlike anything I’ve heard.
Snowmobiles AND zombies?? Nazi zombies?!? Count me in!
This was apparently a big hit at Sundance this year — a Swedish zombie move with a sense of humor. Looks pretty greusome, but the concept sounds hilarious.
This is from Johnny Depp’s list of Top 6 YouTube Videos (from his Vanity Fair interview, and digitized by Vulture). I have to say the first video on the list is one of the most disturbing videos I’ve seen online. Not because it’s particularly graphic or gruesome or anything like that. But precisely because there is no explanation as to why this man (Paris’ Shakespeare & Co. Bookstore owner George Whitman) is cutting his hair by lighting it on fire.
What!?!?!
Incidentally, Depp’s list is — as you might expect — very warped. But he’s got some pretty choice YouTube highlights (including a VERY VERY HIGH James Brown on CNN). Check out the digitized rendering of his Top 6 on Vulture.
It’s pretty amazing that someone took the time to put together that collage over at Serious Lunch. And even more amazing that, yes, Conan’s set does look a lot like a SMB background.
